.

Sunday, March 17, 2019

Against Louis Riels Execution :: essays research papers

Louis Riel should non have been hung because he represented those who couldnt represent themselves. Louis Riel was disappointed with the way the Mtis were, so he took it upon himself to represent the Mtis and their honests. Even though the actions that followed, such as keeping the new governor out the colony, was illegal and genuinely wrong. Riel risked it for the rights of the Mtis. As for Thomas Scott, Riel has absolutely no legal right to have him shot, but Riel himself never touched a gun for that purpose. He had a firing squad shoot Scott. Although, Riel may have tenacious the squad to shoot, but the men could have backed down, no study how powerful Riel seemed. After the rebellion, he was elected by Manitoba to sit in the House of Commons. Riel went to Ottawa but was not every(prenominal)owed to sit as a member in the House, for he was threatened by numerous to be shot if he appeared in the House. This was the mistake of the government. They should have sopped the nons ense and threats. For Riel was a man of ideas. He was a man who was knowledged in the government. It was obvious since he formed his own government. Riel would have been an asset to the Canadian government. In 1884, Gabriel Dumont rode to tonne and asked Riel to defend the Mtis once again. Riel returned to help the natives once more. Riel was risking capture when he returned. This was a very noble act on his part. Instead of staying delicate and safe in Montana, Riel gave up his safety for the Mtis. Riel decided to discipline an unviolent approach this time alternatively of starting an all out rebellion. Riel and the Mtis drew up a petition and presented it to the government. The petition, which demanded more food and capital for the natives, was looked over but not acted upon. The petition was fair in all parts but the government turned it down. It only demanded that what belonged to the natives be returned. In early 1885, Riel formed another provisional government, and started another rebellion. His followers killed many army troops, but once again it was not the hand of Riel that killed so many. It was of people who had their own thoughts and intuitions. They could have easily said no to Riel instead of shooting. In which case Riel was

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.