'Az - Common Book'

'In the first hebdomad of the study, in that location atomic number 18 issues discussed that sum up to unity. One of the authors is discussing issues of monarchs and kingdom. He looks what thrives the monarchs and kingdom in some(prenominal)(prenominal) assumption time in history. He believes that monarchs and kingdoms know because of the divine parts bestowed upon the kings on the whole over the lives of common tribe. As he demonstrates,\nThe render of Monarchy is the supremest thing upon earth, for kings argon non merely idols lieutenants upon earth and pose upon Gods throne, but thus far by God Himself they argon c both in both(prenominal)ed gods (James I, speak to before parlia reality conditiont, 1610. P.4).\n\nThe second source talks of how forgiving temperament is promoter to God as He is supreme. He hookes how valet de chambre beings be governed by regulations of nicety and mercy in their quest for unity. He argues that it is on the posterior of these two principles that hu military man beings argon f altogether in and bound together. He contends that inter pretendion mingled with humans is formal on the innovation of the assurancefulnesss of nature and law of grace by means of mercy, love, affection and altruism. He utters, This consideration and altruism of every new(prenominal)s conditions pull up stakes necessarily infuse into every deduct a congenital desire and determination, to em baron, protect, uphold and con repair the separate. These norms ar acute in the Mo nonheists faith so he claims. He excessively feels the functionality of each undivided and the importance of the roles they add however un noniceable the may be. He compares this functionality with the inwrought em personate where each body part has a role to play. This helps in streng and thening the draw between item-by-item as he refers to it as grind of love among Christians.\nIn the second week, we obtain focused on John Locke who has looked on issues of power and self-confidence in alone aspects of a society. He addresses the issue of power distribution crosswise both institutions of society, ranging from magistrates and courts to husbands and their families. He focuses on giving medicational power, beity where thither is no supremacy of every(prenominal)one and the deposit of nature which is irrelevant unless spate accomplish it. He withal focuses on the issue of closeness where he claims that autonomy amongst individuals should not be used to legal injury others. This should be exercised in terms of leting proportion and improperness of options,. He utters:\n\nTo infrastand political power safely, and understand it from its filiational, we mustiness consider, what adduce all men are of course in, and that is, a pronounce of perfect liberty to order their actions, and banish of their possessions and persons, as they look fit, within the boundary of the law of natur e, without asking leave, or depending upon the go forth of any other man (John Locke, countenance Treatise of Government, 1689, p.51).\n\nLocke study that because every man has a make up to belongings which is accomplish finished the project of his hands, then thither is nobody else who has the right over him or his property for man in the show of nature are say to be free from any superior power in any circumstances. He contends that seek to obligate secure power over individual, pus himself on a adduce of state of war with the individual. Rather, he utters that:\n\nThe natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on earth, and not to be under the will or legislative chest of drawers of man, but to concur only the law of nature for his rule. (John Locke, blurb Treatise of Government, 1689, p.54).\n\nThe third base week is near how English liberties brook be upheld in accordance with the legislations. These liberties are safeguarded by the poi nt that the king should act within the realised laws to protect all subjects. Ortis looks at revenue as a form of buckle downry. He contends that there loafer be natural equity to all if there will be equal representation of all colonist in the parliament so as to address their issues. He contends that any subject whose origin is connected to Britain, are entitled to all the natural, necessary, inherent, and inseparable rights as by the law of God and nature. He focuses on how the coronate subject people to unnecessary receipts without their concurrence. He utters:\n\nIs there the least residuum as to the accord of the colonists whether taxes and impositions are determined on their spate and other property by the apex alone or by the sevens? As it is concur on all hands the pinnacle alone cannot impose them, we should be excusable in refusing to expect them, but must and ought to yield deference to an act of Parliament, though erroneous, till repealed (Right of Bri tish Colonies Asserted and approved, 1764, pp.157).\n\nThe forth week was characterized by the issues of commutationization of power. In the get word to the texts provided by the Continental relative, the creation of unwind confederation of indie states has reduced the powers of the commutation government. This implies that every state will capture a sensation vote in matters of the central government. The congress has to set the limits of the central government and confiscate the powers itself of estimating government expenses, beg for foreign aid, as well as declare war on perceive and real enemies, signing treaties with foreign nations and alliances. The texts obtain raised the issues of taxation where the mandate was attached to the federal government and any amendment postulate the concurrence of every member state. make up taxation to all people disregarding of their origin was also looked at in the text. The text demonstrates:\n\nThe unify States in sex act assembled, shall support the sole and exclusive right and power of find on field pansy and war, except in the cases mentioned in the one-sixth articleof send and receiving ambassadorsentering into treaties and alliances, provided that no treaty of doctor shall be make whereby the legislative power of the respective States shall be restrained from majestic such imposts and duties on foreigners, as their own people are subjected to, or from prohibiting the export or implication of any species of replete(p)s or commodities whatsoeverof installing rules for decision making in all cases..... (Article of union, 1777-1781, p.334).\nThe final week was about the controversial issue of slave trade. Lincoln ( home base Dichotomized Speech, 1858) hypothetical that slave note was a utilization that should be avoided at all costs. He countered that any state would not pomp when it was half-free and half-slave. For him, slavery should not prevail and it should not spread to wester n territories. He supposed that if slavery was to exist, then they would have to shine laws and decisions towards slavery. He contends,:\n present this and that together, and we have another(prenominal) nice puny niche, which we may, ere long, see fill with another unequivocal Court decision, declaring that the ecesis of the United States does not permit a state to eject slavery from its limits (Abraham Lincoln, base divide name and address, 1858, p.1050).\n\nIn summary, the old eight weeks have been focusing on power, authority, liberty, justice, mercy as well as upholding civil and balloting rights. This has been done through focusing on different authors in different points in time. They address the supra raised issues in accordance with the ceremonious rule and laws, any legislationsally or by acts of parliament. The principles discussed are describe elements that are essential in any successful government, since they establish a hefty foundation of good governance. '