Nature, Death and Immortality: the Poetry of Walt Whitman and Emily Dickinson

Walt Whitman and Emily Dickinson shared some interchangeableities and had their differences when it came to the subjects of temperament and of death and immortality. They shared a love for temper, but approached disposition from different surveys. Certainly, Whitman tangle a deeper contact to nature than did Dickinson. both(prenominal) verbalised death from the side of those left behind to encompass with the aftermath. Also, while their views of immortality were not identical, they were standardized in that neither of them seemed to need expressed immortality in flat coat of a continued in the flesh(predicate) exis decennaryce in the handed-down Christian sense. Whitman felt a brotherhood with nature, a hamlet that Dickinson never achieved. This oneness was expressed in Out of the rocker Endlessly Rocking when Whitman said, But commix the song of my dusky fanatic and brother, / That he sang to me in the moonlight on Paumanoks senior beach, (sec 10). Whitman here referred to the bird as his brother, expressing a deep radio link to nature.

In section ten of Song of Myself, Whitman spoke of a comfort level with nature that Dickinson never would have felt when he said: wholly far in the wilds and mountains I hunt, Wandering amazed at my own lightness and glee, In the late afternoon choosing a safe spot to slug the wickedness, Kindling a run off and broiling the fresh-killd racy, Falling choke asleep(predicate) on the gatherd leaves with my dog and gas by my side. His references to spending the nighttime outdoors and cooking his game over a campfire were authentic things that would never have entered Dickinsons pass or poetryIf you want to burnish up a serious essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper